Home > Order By > Order By Not Working Sql Server

Order By Not Working Sql Server


It is convenient, or it is not. Thanks.Reply Nakul Vachhrajani August 24, 2010 7:41 pmLet me start out by thanking you for yet another good, useful and very practical article. Whether the push should happen before the order by is really a developer choice and can change the answer. Along these lines, I view the use of ORDER BY in views (in part) as a means of customer service so that a user of the view doesn't have to understand have a peek here

It also used to work fine in SQL 2000. However your statement about SQL queries returning tables isn't quite correct. First of all you have to know that the ORDER BY clause is used in 2 different contexts in SQL – the programming language itself: With the ORDER BY clause you You will not notice that there is no SORT operation at all.I have heard many people talking about workaround, where they use some other number less than 100 in the TOP http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17762639/sql-order-by-not-working-properly

Order By Not Working Mysql

It helped me to solve the quiz in below link after many days: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis/archive/2006/12/31/Beatles-vs-Stones.aspx Many many thanks. All the separate bits and pieces of SQL knowledge we gathered through the years, were properly tied together by Klaus. But ascending order only. My apoligies.

  • And who wraps exactly one informative sentence ("a VIEW is a table and **by definition** has no ordering") in 10 ranting insults?
  • We tried a fresh install of SQL Server 2005 on another machine and had exactly the same problem.
  • Like or share to get the source code.
  • Theyn try.
  • Clears out a few cobwebs.
  • And none of the supporting arguments are improved by the condescending tone you adopt when you make huge and unfounded assumptions about how I would like to be doing my job.
  • Use this clause to:Order the result set of a query by the specified column list and, optionally, limit the rows returned to a specified range.

This can mean some WITH CHECK OPTION clauses and INSTEAD OF triggers. 2) When the same query is used by multiple users at the same time. of each datra element (see ISO-11179) .. The default plan implementation for this code happens to sort the rows as part of performing the TOP operation. Sql Order By Not Working Properly We haven't made any program changes or anything so we can't understand why we have the problem.Thanks In AdvanceJohn tkizer Almighty SQL Goddess USA 38200 Posts Posted-04/26/2011: 23:40:41

And because we have to use the ORDER BY in combination with a TOP 100 PERCENT, the Query Optimizer has not actually introduced an explicit sort operator in the execution plan. Order By Date Not Working Sql Could someone help me with why you would prefer a view over a stored procedure? Can someone help me with this.? http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/23/sql-server-order-by-does-not-work-limitation-of-the-views-part-1/ I am very tired of burying children who were killed by bad programmng that screwed up medication delivery to Africa, illegal bomb delivery in Cambodia, etc.

And views are useful (addressing a previous user's question) because sometimes (when working with tools such as Access or InfoPath for example) complicated queries or SELECT statements cause problems and simplifying Order By In View Oracle If you do, then why would you not want to macro-ize common combinations of joins you do over and over again? Cheers Serge -- Serge Rielau DB2 Solutions Development DB2 UDB for Linux, Unix, Windows IBM Toronto Lab Jan 26 '06 #10 P: n/a Doug >Someone was asleep in their RDBMS class! That is, either the rows touched by the query are not updated or all requests for pages from the query are executed in a single transaction using either snapshot or serializable

Order By Date Not Working Sql

Therefore we get the rows back sorted by the column BusinessEntityID, which is the Clustered Key value column of that index. More Help Thanks In AdvanceJohnThanks In AdvanceJohn tkizer Almighty SQL Goddess USA 38200 Posts Posted-04/26/2011: 22:18:54 Data will only be sorted in ascending order if you specify ORDER BY ColumnName. Order By Not Working Mysql Copy USE AdventureWorks2012; GO -- Ensure the database can support the snapshot isolation level set for the query. Order By In View Sql Server As you have learned in this blog posting, the ORDER BY clause is used in 2 different contexts, and therefore you always have to consider in which context you are using

Are you old enough to remember when GROUP BY did a sort and T-SQL dialect-only programmers wrote code that depended on that single-processor sort model? navigate here whn i was givin d query in sql to make view thn i m getting error tht order by nt valid n cant b use wid view…..Reply neelesh kumar October 30, Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode July 10th,03:23 PM #1 sql SORT order not It just so happened that in SQL Server 2000, if TOP was 100 PERCENT or {some number >= number of rows in the table}, the optimizer was fairly simplistic and it Order By In View Sql Server 2008

one more thing i would like to add is till the time i dont use INTO , i can see the desired result but as soon as i create new table The Augean stables held thousands of animals and were over a mile long. The sort order is implicitly based on the index chosen in the execution plan. Check This Out The pun worked in English, but what was it in Japanese?

This in-deep knowledge was very well explained and presented by Klaus." 5.0 2015-01-13T15:22:12+00:00 (Be sure to checkout the FREE SQLpassion Performance Tuning Training Plan - you get a weekly email packed Can We Use Order By Clause In View In Sql Server How to improve player engagement in video call for virtual tabletop game? SQL Server has Indexed Views which I believe are better than the Oracle materialised because once set up they are dynamically maintained so are always up-to-date; before responding celko - make

You did that!!

Visual dataflex does not use any form of an SQL Query.Then how does it get data back?--Gail ShawSQL Server MVP Michael Valentine Jones Yak DBA Kernel (pronounced Colonel) USA 7020 Posts Let us start with the first well-known limitation.Order By clause does not work in View. If I have users that want access to normalized data, I create a table on a scheduled basis with all the data they need. Top 100 Percent In Sql Server from (select ...

I like it. Is this a bug in SQL Server? Neither SQL tables nor SQL query results can always qualify as relations. http://gnumatic.com/order-by/order-by-asc-not-working.html Have you read any of my postings about avoiding proprietary code to get portability?

And because we want to be able to reuse that SQL statement as easily as possible, we finally put it into a view definition, like the following one. Eno Alpay Eno Guest July 10th,03:34 PM #2 Re: sql SORT order not working on numbers? In my opinion every developer, working with SQL Server, should know how the indexes are build up, and how the query optimizer is getting to his query plan." 5.0 2015-01-22T12:38:33+00:00 (Be Then, select from the view and specify the ORDER BY. -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------- Thomas A.

The Augean stables held thousands of animals and were over a mile long. In about two hours I moved about half the Order By clauses to the SQL-building routines in the front end of the application, and the rest will finish tomorrow. Employees that have the SalariedFlag set to 1 are returned in order by the BusinessEntityID in descending order. ASC sorts from the lowest value to highest value.

sql share|improve this question edited Jul 20 '13 at 13:20 asked Jul 20 '13 at 13:15 CDT 1,97442857 7 You are ordering by string and not by value. –Joseph Pla Some people have found that "always" does not include SQL 2005. Copy -- Uses AdventureWorks SELECT EmployeeKey, FirstName, LastName FROM DimEmployee WHERE LastName LIKE 'A%' ORDER BY LastName; The following example orders by two columns. Gee, sure sounds like I was right, doesn't it?

You want it further over somewhere, but not really all the way. any > other ideas? What you put in the view doesn't necessarily determine the order that is returned by your SELECT statement. Copy USE AdventureWorks2012; GO SELECT name, SCHEMA_NAME(schema_id) AS SchemaName FROM sys.objects WHERE type = 'U' ORDER BY SchemaName; D.

Feb 7 '06 #40 P: n/a Doug >I have a sarcastic sense of wit that has no relgious taboos, but you are close to the line. I could sympathise with a low budget, part-time developer who has to deal with this but apparently you have little excuse. http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2008/05/13/question-needed-not-answer.aspxHow to ask: http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/brettk/archive/2005/05/25/5276.aspxFor ultra basic questions, follow these links.http://www.sql-tutorial.net/ http://www.firstsql.com/tutor.htm http://www.w3schools.com/sql/default.asp X002548 Not Just a Number 15586 Posts Posted-04/28/2011: 21:35:21 It is so nice to see...makes me feel Looks like it is being ordered by string value, not by numeric value.

From the semantics of the query, the optimizer only really honors the ORDER BY as part of the evaluation of the TOP in that same scope. For any SQL Server Performance Tuning Issue send email at pinal @ sqlauthority.com . How to get the usual order buttons above a listbox/listview Browse more Microsoft SQL Server Questions on Bytes Question stats viewed: 6584 replies: 104 date asked: Jan 24 '06 Follow this In addition to Joe Celko's list, here are some more: * If the same logic has to be used in many different queries, a regular view is great. * If a