Closest thing to a "parameterized view" is an inline table-valued function (ITVF) - it's still a table expressions, but it can use input parameters. –Blaž Dakskobler Jun 2 '14 at 23:52 I can almost see the indexed views for the right application, but there has to be a lot of overhead to maintain that indexed view for large tables. How to stop a Linux process for later execution swapping-out its memory Is there a standard DNS record to indicate the IMAP server for a domain? Fundamentally, you are unioning two data sets, then ordering them, then returning them. Source
huh. from table1 ...) where you write select ... up vote 3 down vote favorite I have a view that joins several tables, just to simplify a frequently called query. You are looking for something entirely different. << What you seem to be looking for is a quick kludge to get over a hump rather than a systematic, mature process that http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15187676/create-a-view-with-order-by-clause
Therefore, I don't understand how this is consistent. Jan 25 '06 #6 P: n/a David Portas Beowulf wrote: So, it's just a coincidence (or perhaps luck) that in other views (see below) the ORDER BY is respected and the It defines the meaning of each datra element (see ISO-11179) .. One exception to the new rule of "no ORDER BY in a view" is when the new TOP function is used in the view also.
Everything I've read on the web suggests that including the TOP directive should enable ORDERY BY in views. Margrethen, Switzerland "I was lucky enough to attend the 4 day long SQL Server Query Tuning Workshop from Klaus in Zurich. The advantage of following standards is that you can escape the contigous files/ contigous records physical model for MUCH better implementations, parallelism, etc. Why We Can't Use Order By Clause In View Thanks for the information.
It is a best practice to explicitly sort the data when accessing the view. Neither SQL tables nor SQL query results can always qualify as relations. Thanks, -Klaus Reply Bernie B 06/11/2015 Great post. http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/21434/why-does-order-by-not-belong-in-a-view You should always read the product specs for features you need to use, that is the same in the standard and also the same for vendor features.
then it was working like order by clause. Sql Server View Order By Top 100 Percent You could never put ORDER BY in a view, without also including TOP. Klaus taught me lot of things I was not aware of. Start my free, unlimited access.
To get an ordering, you have to have a cursor. http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/Adding-an-ORDER-BY-clause-to-a-view-in-SQL-Server OTOH, if you take the EXACT same code, stuff it into a stored procedure, it is guaranteed to work. Order By In View Oracle He has presented View Full → http://www.sqlpassion.at/archive/testimonials/thomas-from-st-margrethenswitzerland/ Arun from London, United Kingdom "My day-to-day writing of SQL has gone up a level – I am able to finely tune individual statements Top 100 Percent In Sql Server Jan 30 '06 #19 P: n/a Erland Sommarskog Doug (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes: huh.
from( select ... http://gnumatic.com/order-by/order-by-not-working-sql-server.html from table1 ....) where you write select ... The various subjects were presented by Klaus in a very clear way View Full → http://www.sqlpassion.at/archive/testimonials/dieter-from-kirchheim-heimstetten-germany/ Markus from Diepoldsau, Switzerland "In the company I am working for, I have to guarantee Unable to convert latex to wolfram alpha's text My boss asks me to stop writing small functions and do everything in the same loop Magento 1: purpose of Magento index tables The Order By Clause Is Invalid In Views
share|improve this answer edited Nov 14 '15 at 2:11 answered Jul 23 '14 at 23:15 crokusek 7841821 add a comment| up vote -5 down vote you can create a view which Nupur Dave is a social media enthusiast and and an independent consultant. Because you get an error? http://gnumatic.com/order-by/order-by-not-working-in-view.html and be creatable.Reply hammad February 29, 2012 9:14 pmIt did not work for my for even 99 percent be work for 50 percentReply Sara June 24, 2012 8:52 pmI just wanted
No problem. Sql Server Order By Not Working You wrap it up as a view, and try to use it like this sql server 2000 does this. Also, why did you have SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT instead of a plain old SELECT?
In fact, I was planning another article on the same subject. are just bags of rows - and then viwes are just virtual bags of virtual rows - views "don't exist" - e.g. The workshop provides an excellent insight into the technical world of SQL Server, explained with many examples of queries and their optimization." 5.0 2015-01-13T15:21:05+00:00 (Be sure to checkout the FREE SQLpassion Difference Between Dim And Relational CREATE VIEW vwRouteReference AS SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT tblItem.ID, tblItem.Numb + ' - ' + tblQuestion.DescrPrimary AS FullName, tblItem.Numb, tblQuestion.DescrPrimary AS Type FROM tblItem INNER JOIN tblQuestion ON (tblItem.ID = tblQuestion.Item_ID)
My adopted daughter is going to die in her 30's because of incompetence in the foster care system. State what version of SQL Server you are using and specify the content of any error messages. State what version of SQL Server you are using and specify the content of any error messages. Check This Out Once you have a cursor, you can have an explicit order.Ben-Gan discusses this in T-SQL Querying and I suspect it's buried somewhere in BOL as well.As an aside, the SELECT TOP